First Place: 4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c99d8/c99d81d880a3311e34bdba8bc38030ab9d083b68" alt=""
Entry number:
091
Exhibitor:
wuvewes
State: IA
Sheep
name/number: 6292
Breed:
Cross
Website:
www.moserclublambs.com |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9c55/f9c555f572971013fd7b1ebd72d3cbc63850da7c" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca78b/ca78b205453063d3c26be323d823451fe794a419" alt=""
Starting this class with the most complete ewe that rises to
the top, I would still like to see her higher in her pin
setting with a stronger, straighter top and more substance
of bone.
|
Second Place: 1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87832/87832fa25595ce9fa7ae2082a0453f43e046ec9e" alt=""
Entry number:
029
Exhibitor:
chadam
State: WA
Breed:
Hampshire X |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb1c7/fb1c7ca44922bfcea7f2c50898c0a578687a22a9" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48684/48684b89a426b321e50ff13cb4d1d024db6f770c" alt=""
In the top pair, 4 places over 1 for her additional
extension and femininity. 1 appears to be a broodier type
ewe already in the breeding pen and may be a stronger
through her rack. However, she appears to be somewhat
coarser through her front than 4.
Still in a middle decision, I prefer the functionality and
eye appeal of 1 over 2. 1 is especially stronger topped and
exhibits more natural muscle expression making this the
easiest pair in the class.
|
Third Place: 2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/753ff/753ff21b092b8f14884c51f7d64c9705d509d7e2" alt=""
Entry number:
030
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00f4d/00f4de412d9a6e6c92401321bf3255e707c780e6" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ad56/4ad5600bda2c0e2bc0e428d5294c383fb9cb817a" alt=""
In a bottom pair, where neither ewe is desirable for show or
producing show lambs, I will resort to choosing the most
practical sheep for a commercial flock. Thus, I determined
to use the more commercially useful 2 over 3. While I may
prefer the cleaner lines and somewhat more upfronted profile
view of 3 over 2; 2 is a heavier bodied ewe with more
practical applications. I do not believe that 2 would be
any more attractive or heavier muscled than the 3 ewe if
both carried the same amount of condition. However, 2 is
the longer bodied, apparently easier fleshing ewe compared
with 3.
|