Class number:
032
Class Date:
12/1/07
Judge:
Gail Christian
Judging Contest Winners:
Under 15: AndrewR, ShelbySue
15-18: bluesheep, clublamb07,
damarisita, JohnnyR
Over 18: DoubleD,
DownSouthSouthdowns, kstahel, Nebsheep |
Official Placing: 4, 2, 3, 1
Cuts: 2, 2, 6
I
placed this class 4, 2, 3, 1. I believe this class easily breaks
down into a top, middle, and bottom pairs. |
First Place: 4
Entry number:
172
Exhibitor:
2TLivestock
State: NE
Sheep
name/number: Pistol Pete
Breed:
Suffolk |
|
At first glance I was tempted to start the class with the
power ewe lamb, number 2. However, on closer examination
this lamb was too short sided to go to the top of the class.
Therefore, I started the class with 4, a lamb that I would
call medium plus in its frame (length of canon bone). When
viewed from the side 4 appears to be lacking in depth of
twist and muscle through the lower third, but this changes
when viewed from the rear which tells me the lamb is too
stretched out in the profile view. (Back legs are set
wide but not square under the corners.) Number 4 is level
in its top and bottom lines with a slight drop off the dock.
(I would appreciate this lamb more with a higher dock
setting.) 4 does exhibit balance, however is slightly off
in its neck setting (a little below the top of the
shoulder). It does appear to be wide over the rack and loin
and long in the hip. I would assume this lamb is wide in
the chest floor because it exhibits a lot of width in the
rear legs, good depth of twist with a full inside leg muscle
and good muscle expression through the stifle.
|
Second Place: 2
Entry number:
156
Exhibitor:
Slomom
State: CA
Sheep
name/number: Sandy/043
Breed:
Cross |
|
In placing lamb 2 second and over 3, I went with the power
of 2 over the frame of 3. Lamb 2 is a medium framed heavily
muscled ewe lamb that is basically structurally correct, but
just too short sided to go any higher in the class. You can
tell this lamb is wide through the chest floor and brings
the width all the way back. Lamb 3 is straight and level in
its top and bottom lines and really exhibits balance. She
appears to be wide and square over the rack and loin and I
would assume deep over the loin edge. She's excellent
through the pins, has tremendous depth of twist, and a
superior inner and outer leg that carries down toward the
hock. I think 2 easily places over 3 for second.
|
Third Place: 3
Entry number:
158
|
|
3 is a medium framed lamb that is lacking in width and
squareness over the rack and loin, drops off in the hip, is
shallow in the twist, pinched in the pins, and does not show
the inner and outer (stifle) muscle of the top two lambs in
the class. With that said, 3 easily places over 1 for third
in the class.
|
Fourth Place: 1
Entry number:
152 |
|
Lamb 1 easily places at the bottom of the class. This
lamb is off in its structure in the following areas: too low
in the neck set, uneven top and bottom lines, too steep over
the hip, narrow through the pins, extremely shallow in the
twist and devoid of muscle through the stifle, too rounded
at point of shoulder, and shallow boned and weak in the
pasterns. I would advise the exhibitor of this lamb to
select a lamb more like number 4 for their next project (and
even though lamb 4 wins this class it would just be in the
middle of the class at a typical competitive Texas show).
For these reasons I placed the class 4, 2, 3, 1 with cuts of
2, 2, and 6. As a side note...you didn't bomb this
class unless you saw lambs 3 and 1 as the top pair. If you
saw 3 and 1 as the top pair I would advise you to sit down
and at your convenience and rejudge all 32 classes, paying
close attention to the written reasons for each class.
Good luck,
OG
|
|