Second Place: 3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d6f4/4d6f4ea12be82ca5a9603f0978e2aee4a0f54270" alt=""
Entry number: 1583
Exhibitor: Heresheep
State: CA
Sheep
name/number: Three Sisters Sheep 939
Breed: Hamp X
Website: www.threesisterssheep.com |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48684/48684b89a426b321e50ff13cb4d1d024db6f770c" alt=""
I'll concede the middle pair of lambs offer the trendier, more attractive packages; however, this is a feeder class, which is why neither wins the class. The middle pair was very competitive in my mind: both are trendy, well balanced, stout made wethers. I ultimately chose 3 over 4 because he is longer bodied with a greater volume of muscle over the topside of his skeleton.
|
Third Place: 4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71c38/71c38c0ceb2e8e362d49e2ff6544e99842c4f020" alt=""
Entry number: 1585
Exhibitor: EmsoffLambs
State: CA
Sheep name/number: Emsoff #603
Breed: Hampshire X
Website: www.emsofflivestockcompany.com
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ad56/4ad5600bda2c0e2bc0e428d5294c383fb9cb817a" alt=""
I'll admit, 4 stands with more genuine width at the ground; however, it's his shorter body (and accordingly less overall volume of muscle) along with a rougher hip-loin junction that loses him the pair.
|